Hypothetical SiO$_{2}$-like WN$_{2}$ structure: A2B_cI36_229_h_d-001

Picture of Structure; Click for Big Picture
Prototype N$_{2}$W
AFLOW prototype label A2B_cI36_229_h_d-001
Pearson symbol cI36
Space group number 229
Space group symbol $Im\overline{3}m$
AFLOW prototype command aflow --proto=A2B_cI36_229_h_d-001
--params=$a, \allowbreak y_{2}$

  • This structure was studied by (Mehl, 2015) as part of an effort to understand vacancy formation in the N$_{1-x}$W$_{x}$ system. It was produced by removing 4 nitrogen and 10 tungsten atoms from a 64-atom supercell of the rock salt ($B1$) structure. The resulting structure leaves four nitrogen atoms forming a tetrahedron around each tungsten atom, with the perfect regular tetrahedron occuring when y$_{2}$ = 1/$\sqrt{8}$ with an N-W-N bond angle of 109.47$^\circ$. It is similar to the idealized $\beta$-cristobalite SiO$_{2}$ structure, although the current structure has never been reported for any compound.
  • The y$_{2}$-value for this structure reported in (Mehl, 2015) Table VI should be replaced by 1/2 - y$_{2}$, as we do here.

\[ \begin{array}{ccc} \mathbf{a_{1}}&=&- \frac{1}{2}a \,\mathbf{\hat{x}}+\frac{1}{2}a \,\mathbf{\hat{y}}+\frac{1}{2}a \,\mathbf{\hat{z}}\\\mathbf{a_{2}}&=&\frac{1}{2}a \,\mathbf{\hat{x}}- \frac{1}{2}a \,\mathbf{\hat{y}}+\frac{1}{2}a \,\mathbf{\hat{z}}\\\mathbf{a_{3}}&=&\frac{1}{2}a \,\mathbf{\hat{x}}+\frac{1}{2}a \,\mathbf{\hat{y}}- \frac{1}{2}a \,\mathbf{\hat{z}} \end{array}\]

Basis vectors

Lattice coordinates Cartesian coordinates Wyckoff position Atom type
$\mathbf{B_{1}}$ = $\frac{1}{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{1}+\frac{3}{4} \, \mathbf{a}_{2}+\frac{1}{4} \, \mathbf{a}_{3}$ = $\frac{1}{4}a \,\mathbf{\hat{x}}+\frac{1}{2}a \,\mathbf{\hat{z}}$ (12d) W I
$\mathbf{B_{2}}$ = $\frac{1}{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{1}+\frac{1}{4} \, \mathbf{a}_{2}+\frac{3}{4} \, \mathbf{a}_{3}$ = $\frac{1}{4}a \,\mathbf{\hat{x}}+\frac{1}{2}a \,\mathbf{\hat{y}}$ (12d) W I
$\mathbf{B_{3}}$ = $\frac{1}{4} \, \mathbf{a}_{1}+\frac{1}{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{2}+\frac{3}{4} \, \mathbf{a}_{3}$ = $\frac{1}{2}a \,\mathbf{\hat{x}}+\frac{1}{4}a \,\mathbf{\hat{y}}$ (12d) W I
$\mathbf{B_{4}}$ = $\frac{3}{4} \, \mathbf{a}_{1}+\frac{1}{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{2}+\frac{1}{4} \, \mathbf{a}_{3}$ = $\frac{1}{4}a \,\mathbf{\hat{y}}+\frac{1}{2}a \,\mathbf{\hat{z}}$ (12d) W I
$\mathbf{B_{5}}$ = $\frac{3}{4} \, \mathbf{a}_{1}+\frac{1}{4} \, \mathbf{a}_{2}+\frac{1}{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{3}$ = $\frac{1}{2}a \,\mathbf{\hat{y}}+\frac{1}{4}a \,\mathbf{\hat{z}}$ (12d) W I
$\mathbf{B_{6}}$ = $\frac{1}{4} \, \mathbf{a}_{1}+\frac{3}{4} \, \mathbf{a}_{2}+\frac{1}{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{3}$ = $\frac{1}{2}a \,\mathbf{\hat{x}}+\frac{1}{4}a \,\mathbf{\hat{z}}$ (12d) W I
$\mathbf{B_{7}}$ = $2 y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{1}+y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{2}+y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{3}$ = $a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{y}}+a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{z}}$ (24h) N I
$\mathbf{B_{8}}$ = $y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{2}- y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{3}$ = $- a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{y}}+a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{z}}$ (24h) N I
$\mathbf{B_{9}}$ = $- y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{2}+y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{3}$ = $a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{y}}- a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{z}}$ (24h) N I
$\mathbf{B_{10}}$ = $- 2 y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{1}- y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{2}- y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{3}$ = $- a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{y}}- a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{z}}$ (24h) N I
$\mathbf{B_{11}}$ = $y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{1}+2 y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{2}+y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{3}$ = $a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{x}}+a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{z}}$ (24h) N I
$\mathbf{B_{12}}$ = $- y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{1}+y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{3}$ = $a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{x}}- a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{z}}$ (24h) N I
$\mathbf{B_{13}}$ = $y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{1}- y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{3}$ = $- a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{x}}+a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{z}}$ (24h) N I
$\mathbf{B_{14}}$ = $- y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{1}- 2 y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{2}- y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{3}$ = $- a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{x}}- a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{z}}$ (24h) N I
$\mathbf{B_{15}}$ = $y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{1}+y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{2}+2 y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{3}$ = $a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{x}}+a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{y}}$ (24h) N I
$\mathbf{B_{16}}$ = $y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{1}- y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{2}$ = $- a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{x}}+a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{y}}$ (24h) N I
$\mathbf{B_{17}}$ = $- y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{1}+y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{2}$ = $a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{x}}- a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{y}}$ (24h) N I
$\mathbf{B_{18}}$ = $- y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{1}- y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{2}- 2 y_{2} \, \mathbf{a}_{3}$ = $- a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{x}}- a y_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{y}}$ (24h) N I

References

  • M. J. Mehl, D. Finkenstadt, C. Dane, G. L. W. Hart, and S. Curtarolo, Finding the stable structures of N$_{1-x}$W$_{x}$ with an {\em ab initio} high-throughput approach, Phys. Rev. B 91, 184110 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.184110.

First cited in

  • N. Anderson, M. J. Mehl, H. Eckert, S. Divilov, X. Campilongo, S. Curtarolo, The AFLOW Library of Crystallographic Prototypes: Part 5. Submitted to Computational Materials Science (2026).

Geometry files


Prototype Generator

aflow --proto=A2B_cI36_229_h_d --params=$a,y_{2}$

Species:

Running:

Output: