We follow (Louca, 2010) in calling this $\alpha$–FeSe. While some authorities list this as a prototype of $\alpha$–PbO, we find that the difference in structures is enough to warrant giving FeSe its own prototype.
(Louca, 2010) note that the Se ion concentration is close to 1.
The data is presented for the structure at 7 K.
The ICSD entry is from the (Lehman, 2010) conference proceedings.
(Louca, 2010) find $a ≈ b$. As with orthorhombic $\alpha$–PbO and tetragonal ($B10$) PbO, this causes AFLOW to place this in the tetragonal $P4/nmm$ #129 space group if the default settings are used. The experimentally reported structure is only obtained if we use the command
$\alpha$–FeSe and $\alpha$–PbO have the same AFLOW prototype label, AB_oC8_67_a_g. They are generated by the same symmetry operations with different sets of parameters (--params) specified in their corresponding CIF files.
$\frac{1}{2}a \,\mathbf{\hat{x}}+\frac{1}{4}b \,\mathbf{\hat{y}}- c z_{2} \,\mathbf{\hat{z}}$
(4g)
Se I
References
D. Louca, K. Horigane, A. Llobet, R. Arita, S. Ji, N. Katayama, S. Konbu, K. Nakamura, T.-Y. Koo, P. Tong, and K. Yamada, Local atomic structure of superconducting FeSe$_{1-x}$Te$_{x}$, Phys. Rev. B 81, 134524 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.134524.
M. C. Lehman, A. Llobet, K. Horigane, and D. Louca, The crystal structure of superconducting FeSe$_{1-x}$Te$_{x}$ by pulsed neutron diffraction, J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 251, 012009 (2010), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/251/1/012009.
First cited in
D. Hicks, M. J. Mehl, E. Gossett, C. Toher, O. Levy, R. M. Hanson, G. L. W. Hart, and S. Curtarolo, The AFLOW Library of Crystallographic Prototypes: Part 2, Comp. Mat. Sci. 161, S1-S1011 (2019). (doi=10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.10.043)